Comments on: Wolverine by Hama & Silvestri https://comicbinding.com/mapping/wolverine-by-hama-silvestri A Community for Comic Binding Sat, 07 Jun 2025 18:14:09 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40 By: nacho https://comicbinding.com/mapping/wolverine-by-hama-silvestri/comment-page-1#comment-226 Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:57:44 +0000 http://comicbinding.com/?p=1032#comment-226 Both. They are stand-alone issues by fill-in writers and artists.

Not that they are bad necessarily (well, they are pretty weak), but they didn’t contribute to the overall story that Hama was weaving in the Silvestri issues, and I didn’t care to water down the awesome art. I did include issue 51 drawn by Andy Kubert because it is part of the big story, so it’s an anomaly. The run overall is fantastic, still the best Wolvie run ever IMO.

]]> By: Corwin https://comicbinding.com/mapping/wolverine-by-hama-silvestri/comment-page-1#comment-225 Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:42:11 +0000 http://comicbinding.com/?p=1032#comment-225 The Wolverine Classic trades go up to #30 and it seems #31 and up is prime for binding. After getting a few issues I must agree I think the quality jumped up by leaps and bounds.

Why did you leave out #44, 47 and 54? Not Silvestri? Are they stand alone stories?

]]>